| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:32:24AM -0400, Ralph Hempel wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Phil is 100% correct here. It's heartening to see someone so thoroughly >> getting it after having to so frequently deal with the misconceptions >> about -mno-cygwin. Confusion about -mwindows is new though. >> I'm counting the days until -mno-cygwin disappears. It is a blight that >> must be expunged. I know that as soon as it is gone there will be a >> general wail from people who use it but it really should never have been >> implemented. > > As one of "those people" I wonder if it will still be possible to > generate executables that do not depend on cygwin DLLs using > cygwin's gcc? No, we're changing the laws of the universe to make this a physical impossibility. At your first attempt to generate a mingw cross compiler you will be shunted into an antimatter dimension where your atoms will explode in an unbelievable burst of energy. Sorry. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |