X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<489C668C.2070200@nc.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:30:20 -0400
From:	Burt Silverman <bsilverman AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 1.5.25 : Very slow command
References:	<4899EC23 DOT 8030605 AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4899EC23.8030605@nc.rr.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Adding "title" to the CYGWIN variable (e.g., CYGWIN = title) in 
Cygwin.bat as per the user manual gives a tremendous psychological 
advantage, lowering the slow start pain, as one can see that things are 
really happening.  "ls" is working perfectly fine -- I will reboot if I 
ever see it behave slowly again compared to Windows native "dir" command.

Burt Silverman wrote:
> Just confirming Bruno DeLoroux observation that cygwin starts very 
> very slowly on some Windows XP installations.  And "ls" is fairly 
> slow.  My Desktop PC is generally faster than my laptop, but the 
> situation is reversed with regards to these cygwin activities; startup 
> is painful on the Desktop.
>
> Burt
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -