delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:48:50 +0200 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Does anyone use insight on cygwin? |
Message-ID: | <20080807084850.GA3806@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20080804233810 DOT GA13054 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20080804233810.GA13054@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Aug 4 19:38, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Does anyone actually use insight on Cygwin? Keith Seitz, the insight > maintainer, has recently made changes which will allow insight to work > with a non-special version of tcl/tk rather than the hacked version that > it had previously been built with. That opens the door to building a > real version of tcl/tk for cygwin and linking insight to it. > Unfortunately, I believe that would mean that insight would need to run > in an X window rather than natively. > > The other alternative is to nuke insight entirely. Is anyone really > relying on it? Since I barely test it when I release gdb, I'd expect > that there would be problem reports but I don't remember seeing any for > quite some time. Right now, we have tcl and tk libs which are not using the standard naming convention for Cygwin DLLs. Doesn't that leave room for having two versions of insight? We could keep the old tcl84.dll and tk84.dll and a w-insight which is built against that. Plus other older tcl/tk apps would still run. And we can have new versions of tcl and tk which use the Cygwin naming convention and are linked against the X lib, plus a new x-insight. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |