| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <1218043716 DOT 30536 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W752A63DF14AA0636D07886E67A0 AT phx DOT gbl> |
| Subject: | RE: ABI unification |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:22:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <005501c8f81b$575346e0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
| In-Reply-To: | <COL101-W752A63DF14AA0636D07886E67A0@phx.gbl> |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Jay wrote on 07 August 2008 00:07:
> First, I meant a uniform compile time ABI.
> Not an ability to mix and match at runtime.
This thing ...
> I simply want to compile two .objs with the different
> compilers and headers, and then link them together,
> trafficing in whatever.
... and this thing completely contradict each other. What's the use of
being able to link them together if they don't work at runtime?
> Anyway, given the errno.h mismatches, it's not possible without a
> breaking change.
It's pointless in either case.
> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port?
The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense. You
need to do a bit more homework. I suggest you start by reading the first
sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/. It should explain to you
why there's never going to be any "non-x86 Cygwin port".
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |