X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4897B8B0.7020402@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:19:28 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080723 Remi/2.0.0.16-1.fc5.remi Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Does anyone use insight on cygwin?
References:	<20080804233810 DOT GA13054 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20080804233810.GA13054@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Does anyone actually use insight on Cygwin?  Keith Seitz, the insight
> maintainer, has recently made changes which will allow insight to work
> with a non-special version of tcl/tk rather than the hacked version that
> it had previously been built with.  That opens the door to building a
> real version of tcl/tk for cygwin and linking insight to it.
> Unfortunately, I believe that would mean that insight would need to run
> in an X window rather than natively.
> 
> The other alternative is to nuke insight entirely.  Is anyone really
> relying on it?  Since I barely test it when I release gdb, I'd expect
> that there would be problem reports but I don't remember seeing any for
> quite some time.
> 
> Oh, and in case anyone is wondering what insight is - it's the graphic
> version of gdb available by typing "insight" or "gdb -w".
> 
> If you're wondering what gdb is then please just delete this message.
> Nothing to see here.

I don't have much to add other than to say I've used insight and will
continue to do so.  I also could "deal" with it if insight became X
dependent, though I share the concerns about that and the state of the
X server on Cygwin.  Still, it sounds like there's some hope for
improvements here so I think having an X-based insight over no insight
would be the lesser of two evils. :-)  Also ditto about splitting out
the package if we're going that route.  Perhaps the non-X gdb could have
an insight and gdb -w that tells the user to install the X gdb package
(a la Ubuntu)?

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -