X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4883B326.8030805@cygwin.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:50:30 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: File permissions cygwin install
References:	<4881AC61 DOT 7030807 AT alice DOT it>
In-Reply-To:	<4881AC61.7030807@alice.it>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
>  >
>>> I don't beleieve it is supposed to be this way?
>  >
>> setup.exe creates the files with Windows default permissions. Usually 
>> those are determined by the inheritable permissions of the
>> parent directory in which you install the Cygwin directory.  
> 
>> Setup is a plain Win32 application which doesn't know about POSIX perms.
> 
> OK, this is known. But...
> 
> Is it supposed to be that way on Cygwin [1]?
> 
> Or we can adopt some workaround?
> 
> For example on Linux:
>    drwxr-xr-x  3 root root    0 Jul  4 13:52 home
> 
> and similar for /lib, /usr...
> 
> While on Cygwin:
>    drwxrwxrwx+  3 Administrator  Users 0 Jul  4 13:52 home
> 
> 
> It should be at least:
>    drwxr-xr-x  3 Administrator Administrators  0 Jul  4 13:52 home
> 
> 
> or not?
>

Doing so would likely remove the ability that we have now the allows
users pre-create the installation directory with the permissions
they want to have for the entire tree.  So adding the additional
functionality you speak of to 'setup.exe', while possible, comes
with additional costs beyond the obvious (of just implementing
your idea).


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -