X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:40:08 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe command line parameters
Message-ID:	<20080624004008.GA12901@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<485C0309 DOT 7080404 AT bmts DOT com> <005601c8d39f$3e3cc550$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <485E7502 DOT 3030200 AT x-ray DOT at> <485EE8C5 DOT 8010106 AT bmts DOT com> <003701c8d508$cf4aa750$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <485F8A81 DOT 5020407 AT bmts DOT com> <005a01c8d528$fa4197f0$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <48603D26 DOT 2020302 AT bmts DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<48603D26.2020302@bmts.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:17:42PM -0400, Ralph Hempel wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>>Well, it needs a little debugging first, but it shouldn't be tricky to
>>bash into shape.
>
>Sorry for taking so long, but here's what we have so far.  The "newer"
>patch referred to by Reini is against but the patch is against 2.590
>which looks like it's a bout 2 point releases behind the current
>version in the 1.7 tree for setup.
>
>The current "released" version of setup is 2.573.2.2
>
>So the question is, if I'm going to look at patching setup to accept a
>list of packages on the command line, then which version should we be
>merging the patches against?

If you are going to be discussing setup development you should subscribe
to the cygwin-apps mailing list.

I can't speak for the setup.exe developers but I suspect that you should
be just using the CVS head for all of your development.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -