X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:50:25 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch to allow Cron to use non-POSIX shells like Powershell.exe and CMD.exe
Message-ID:	<20080605235025.GA29853@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<2abc9c2d0806050258n18191f38i1188b0e9d83ed7ae AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <484842DE DOT 2010804 AT tlinx DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<484842DE.2010804@tlinx.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:47:42PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Blair Sutton wrote:
>> Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net> writes:
>>>Why should we patch a cygwin utility to promote the use of a non-cygwin
>>>shell?
>
>None of the shells are 'cygwin', really, -- they are shells that took
>their ideas from close-source Bell-Labs research.  But before they
>became open source, Bell labs allowed students to use it for free --
>and it became popular -- eventually clones were developed and even
>later eventually, most of the bell labs sources were opened up.

I think everyone here is aware of the fact that the majority of the
packages in Cygwin were not designed for Cygwin but they were all
designed for a UNIX platform.  And that is the goal of the project.
Supporting Windows utilities is secondary.  Cygwin endeavors to present
an environment where shells understand "-c" rather than "/c".

So, while there's no reason to just automatically reject a patch
which changes that behavior, there is certainly reason to be
skeptical about patch which introduced non-UNIX behavior since
it obviously goes against the whole reason for the project.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -