X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<48442EDB.11A94F8@dessent.net>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:33:15 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: rebase not compilable
References:	<6910a60806020741t7ff86d8bgbb7866e62acf1c09 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <484411AA DOT AF8A9011 AT dessent DOT net> <026f01c8c4d3$a4309510$2708a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

>   There are only 1024 possible image bases to choose from, and any DLL >=
> 256kB in size will span several of them.  Collisions are an inevitability,
> no?   I think we'll probably still have a need for rebase until the whole
> world goes 64bit and we've got room for a few more hash buckets[*].

If the hash function is poor then don't you think it would make more
sense to try to improve it to avoid collisions than to perpetuate this
backwater hack of having to rebaseall over and over?

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -