X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Tom Van Looy" <assarix AT pandora DOT be>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	lino DOT m DOT tinoco AT telecom DOT pt
Sensitivity:	Normal
Message-ID:	<W787482053425351211979132@nocme1bl6.telenet-ops.be>
X-Forwarded-For:	[10.10.1.191]
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 12:52:12 +0000
Subject:	Re: Bug in /usr/bin/ping
Reply-To:	assarix AT pandora DOT be
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I looked a little further and saw that this is a port that I probably just installed to try it out and hoped it had GNU ping arguments (so bash scripts are portable between Linux and Cygwin).

Anyway, I don't know what happend but it's a 4.3BSD utility. Even 4.3BSD derived systems do the return stuff correctly nowadays.

Cygwin port maintained by: Lino Tinoco <lino DOT m DOT tinoco AT telecom DOT pt>
Please address all questions to the Cygwin mailing list at <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>

Shouldn't this package just be dropped or at least be marked obsolete?
Cygwin is supposed to be a Linux-like environment. I don't think outdated 4.3BSD tools belong there. Windows ping even has more similarities with Linux ping than that ping in packages ...

Kind regards,

Tom Van Looy



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -