X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<47F7E7D1.54F0E49D@dessent.net>
Date:	Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:57:53 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	gcc 4.3 (was: gettext latest vers. 0.17)
References:	<20080405095403 DOT 2168 AT blackhawk> <47F6EA4F DOT 5865B471 AT dessent DOT net> <ft7hnj$2ne$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Lilja wrote:

> Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress brian
> {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply ignoring
> the questions I mailed you? ;)

Yes, that is my email address and yes I read messages sent there.  I'm
sorry that I didn't reply.  I generally ignore or deprioritize people
who email me directly asking something because I feel that replying on
mailing lists is a lot better use of my time than sending personal
emails.  Further, I just got back from traveling and had a backlog of
thousands of messages across a number of mailing lists, so I've been
working my way through that.

The topic that you asked about (gcc 4.3) is complex, and I feel it has
been covered in the archives sufficiently that I didn't feel like
writing another essay on the topic.  It is far from "quiet" as you
suggest.  Here are some recent threads:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/25885/focus=25930
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2007-11/threads.html#00051 (and
continued in december:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2007-12/threads.html#00053)

In short: Exception handling is a complicated situation, both because of
the lack of upstream support for shared target libraries as well as the
desire to transition away from SJLJ.  I think the above threads pretty
clearly spell out what issues are still required to be addressed and
what pains we may encounter when moving to a very different version of
gcc as the default.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -