X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<47F23164.8040604@wpkg.org>
Date:	Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:58:12 +0200
From:	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo AT wpkg DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061110 Mandriva/1.5.0.8-1mdv2007.1 (2007.1) Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: using rsync with Win32/UNC pathnames?
References:	<47F223A5 DOT 5010103 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F22572 DOT 3030406 AT byu DOT net> <47F2276F DOT 7080405 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F229BD DOT 2060507 AT byu DOT net> <47F22BD6 DOT 3040801 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F22DF5 DOT 6020108 AT byu DOT net> <20080401124823 DOT GQ4468 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20080401124823.GQ4468@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
> On Apr  1 06:43, Eric Blake wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> According to Tomasz Chmielewski on 4/1/2008 6:34 AM:
>> | Nope, they are not supported in snapshots; drive snapshots are nothing
>> | different than a normal drive (I assume you're talking about VSS /
>> | shadow copy snapshots for the whole drive, i.e. snapshot C:, it appears
>> | as read-only V:?).
>>
>> Nope.  I'm talking about cygwin snapshots:
>> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.snapshots
> 
> That's right, but.
> 
> <generic advice>
> The problem is that long path names are supported by the snapshot Cygwin
> DLLs, but not necessarily by the applications using it.  Since the
> applications in the Cygwin net distro are still compiled under Cygwin
> 1.5.x, there's some (hopefully low) probability that applications are
> using static buffers of size PATH_MAX, which is defined as 260 in 1.5.x.
> So, right now, there's no guarantee that applications will be able to
> deal with long path names, unless they have been compiled under a Cygwin
> snapshot with all new header files installed.
> </generic advice>

I see.
Probably a reason why it fails for me.


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -