X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:48:23 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: using rsync with Win32/UNC pathnames?
Message-ID:	<20080401124823.GQ4468@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<47F223A5 DOT 5010103 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F22572 DOT 3030406 AT byu DOT net> <47F2276F DOT 7080405 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F229BD DOT 2060507 AT byu DOT net> <47F22BD6 DOT 3040801 AT wpkg DOT org> <47F22DF5 DOT 6020108 AT byu DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<47F22DF5.6020108@byu.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Apr  1 06:43, Eric Blake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Tomasz Chmielewski on 4/1/2008 6:34 AM:
> | Nope, they are not supported in snapshots; drive snapshots are nothing
> | different than a normal drive (I assume you're talking about VSS /
> | shadow copy snapshots for the whole drive, i.e. snapshot C:, it appears
> | as read-only V:?).
>
> Nope.  I'm talking about cygwin snapshots:
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.snapshots

That's right, but.

<generic advice>
The problem is that long path names are supported by the snapshot Cygwin
DLLs, but not necessarily by the applications using it.  Since the
applications in the Cygwin net distro are still compiled under Cygwin
1.5.x, there's some (hopefully low) probability that applications are
using static buffers of size PATH_MAX, which is defined as 260 in 1.5.x.
So, right now, there's no guarantee that applications will be able to
deal with long path names, unless they have been compiled under a Cygwin
snapshot with all new header files installed.
</generic advice>


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -