X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<47EB7928.5050407@gnu.org>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:38:32 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <bonzini AT gnu DOT org>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab AT suse DOT de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>,
	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Build system cleanups 1/4
References:	<47EB7269 DOT 3090309 AT gnu DOT org> <jeej9wihzp DOT fsf AT sykes DOT suse DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<jeej9wihzp.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <bonzini AT gnu DOT org> writes:
> 
>> This one removes the PICFLAG variables, which are never set, as well as
>> the makefile fragments that used to set PICFLAG *at the time of Cygnus
>> configure*.
>>
>> Committed to gcc and (shortly) to src.
> 
> AFAICS this is used by libiberty when --enable-shared.

Also, considering that libstdc++ compiles its own cp-demangle.c, and has 
always done so since it started using the libiberty demangler (r78553):

cp-demangle.c:
         rm -f $@
         $(LN_S) $(toplevel_srcdir)/libiberty/cp-demangle.c $@
cp-demangle.lo: cp-demangle.c
         $(LTCOMPILE) -DIN_GLIBCPP_V3 -Wno-error -c $<
cp-demangle.o: cp-demangle.c
         $(C_COMPILE) -DIN_GLIBCPP_V3 -Wno-error -c $<

I wonder why we still compile libiberty for the target at all.  Neither 
it nor libobjc needs it, which would leave only all-target-fastjar 
(which is a bogus target anyway) and all-target-winsup.

Cygwin people, does winsup actually need a target libiberty?  If so, 
were you aware that the target libiberty is not compiled as PIC?

Paolo

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -