X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<20080322214247.61705.qmail@web3313.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
Date:	Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:42:47 +0900 (JST)
From:	Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant2 AT yahoo DOT co DOT jp>
Reply-To:	matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp
Subject:	Re: Cygwin problems under Vista
To:	matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp, Vinod Gupta <vinod AT Princeton DOT EDU>,
	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20080322185434.43635.qmail@web3304.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello

I'll forward the message from Vinod.
I cannot reply him any longer since I am mere a user.

My opinion is that if the Cygwin-X  no longer works well on the Vista, at least it should be stated on
the web.

Regards

Tatsuro 

--- Vinod Gupta wrote:
As I said in my original posting, lots of people have reported Cygwin-X
problems under Vista, not XP. What surprises me is why Cygwin is
insisting on bundling a broken and unmaintained package when a working
one is available.

Regards,

--------------------------------------
Easy + Joy + Powerful = Yahoo! Bookmarks x Toolbar
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -