delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2008/03/18/23:22:19

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:21:38 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: FAQ suggestion
Message-ID: <20080319042138.GF22446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <a71bd89a0803181415w18070c8u59c3091defcb1a5b AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20080318232317 DOT GA22446 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <a71bd89a0803181715w3d267899vb01cddaa12810423 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <47E05D4D DOT 8000000 AT byu DOT net> <a71bd89a0803181737o4e15c0dcl67bb58f66a57afbc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20080319040517 DOT GD22446 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <a71bd89a0803182114p7edcffefh6288dbffd2614219 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a71bd89a0803182114p7edcffefh6288dbffd2614219@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:14:21PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>:-)
>
>Seriously, though, something belongs in the FAQ
>about this stuff, doesn't it?    My third draft was
>only one quarter satire; most of it was pretty straight
>up.  I can redraft it without the satire if you like.
>Don't assume that everyone who asks the question
>is trying to cheat or bend the rules; I'm a pretty fierce
>free software advocate myself.

I assume that they are either trying to 1) cheat, 2) bend the rules, 3)
not spend any time whatsoever worrying about the problem, or 4) become
annoyed because they have thought about it for thirty seconds and it
seems like we're purposely trying to punish them.

But, yes, sure, a FAQ entry would not be a bad idea.  

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019