X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<47b97e22 DOT 1ed7720a DOT 6129 DOT 734a AT mx DOT google DOT com> <47B981E2 DOT B6FEC53F AT dessent DOT net>
Subject:	RE: is it possible to re-compile sshd to support "real-user" login in terms of public key authentication
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:25 -0000
Message-ID:	<003b01c87231$05f42730$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<47B981E2.B6FEC53F@dessent.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 18 February 2008 13:02, Brian Dessent wrote:

> Chen Yue wrote:

>> Is it possible I re-compile Cygwin sshd to support this feature?
> 
> I don't understand the logic here.  If certain functionality is not
> implemented how is simply recompiling going to change anything?

  Theoretically it could have been the case that there was a
--enable/--disable configure option that might make the difference.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -