delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 5 17:23, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Feb 4 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >>>>> The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is >>>>> implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I >>>>> will get back with you off list if I don't spot the problem. >>>> I am fairly certain that Corinna would want to keep any correspondence >>>> on-list. >>> Yup, that's right. >> OK, we have isolated the problem now. Confirming its in the libgfortran. >> The reason we did not see it on Linux is because we just did not run out of >> memory yet and when the test program completes, it does actually free what >> was allocated. We are failing to reuse an already allocated block so we >> were allocating a new one for every single WRITE to the string. >> >> Thanks for all your help. > > Thanks for letting us know. > > > Corinna > An interim patch to gcc 4.3 has been committed to svn. see gcc bugzilla pr35063 for details. It was a mutex lock issue. Not closing the handle after the lock was no longer needed. Jerry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |