X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<E173C70E3D81F74188D2778B96C5CD0D011B4A73 AT postal1-dog DOT naughtydog DOT com> <20080204150853 DOT GD5866 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <E173C70E3D81F74188D2778B96C5CD0D011B4AE2 AT postal1-dog DOT naughtydog DOT com> <20080204205620 DOT GA2720 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <E173C70E3D81F74188D2778B96C5CD0D011B4B5C AT postal1-dog DOT naughtydog DOT com> <E173C70E3D81F74188D2778B96C5CD0D011B4BD0 AT postal1-dog DOT naughtydog DOT com> <02fb01c86795$9aeb5080$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080205133450 DOT GB307 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <032c01c867fd$c573da30$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080205142712 DOT GA840 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <03a301c86835$1a571850$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <foditk$f9a$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Subject:	RE: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:46:19 -0000
Message-ID:	<04ad01c86998$34e53080$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<foditk$f9a$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 07 February 2008 00:22, Matt Seitz wrote:

> "Dave Korn"  wrote in message
> news:03a301c86835$1a571850$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM...

  I did?!  It was email when *I* last saw it!

>>   My win32 "T:" drive is a netapp share (CIFS with NFS perms)

> I'm assuming you mean "T: maps to a CIFS share that points to a volume or
> QTree that is configured with the UNIX security model".

  Yep, pardon loose terminology.

>  If that is the
> case, NetApp will not allow you to change file permissions.  Configuring a
> volume or QTree to use the UNIX security model means that only NFS clients
> are allowed to change security permissions.  If you want to be able to
> change permissions, you need to set the security model to either "Mixed"
> (both CIFS and NFS can change permissions) or "NTFS" (CIFS can change
> permissions, NFS can't). 

  Don't think people would like me playing around with structural
configuration on the main live production server... ;-)  I'm not up-to-date on
the state of cygwin vs. nfs, but that would probably be another solution for
me.

 > Actually, as another poster mentioned, there is another option.  NetApp
> provides a special Windows Explorer shell extension called "SecureShare". 
> This extension allows CIFS clients to change permissions on UNIX security
> model volumes and QTrees.  If cygwin could hook into that mechanism, it
> could change permissions on UNIX security model volumes and QTrees.

  Heh, yes, I know.  I was that other poster!

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -