X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<47999922.1070207@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:09:06 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: libtools
References:	<20080124160818 DOT 2840 AT blackhawk>
In-Reply-To:	<20080124160818.2840@blackhawk>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

wynfield AT gmail DOT com wrote:
> libtool1.5     1.5.23c-1   and
> libltdl3       1.5.23c-1
> 
> some time ago, and just ran setup to get the new "which" program and
> it wants to revert me to 1.5.23a.....  I understand that 1.5.23c was 
> experimental... I just want to ask if it is still so and what are its
> prospects at being the default libtoll..

The current setup.hint says:

prev: 1.5.23a-1
curr: 1.5.23a-2
test: 1.5.23c-1

But in actuality, I uploaded 1.5.25a last July, and forgot to edit the 
setup.hint.  So, I'm going to rotate things a bit -- and put 1.5.25a as 
the new test, and "promote" the year-old 1.5.23c-1 to curr.

Ping me again in a few weeks (that is, after folks who are interested 
have had a chance to test the "new" 1.5.25a, and I'll rotate them again.

Just in time for 2.0beta...

--
Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -