X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:03:40 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Maybe 1.5 Regression: cp failing while working with cygwin 1.3.22
Message-ID:	<20080115140340.GF5097@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<478CA52E DOT 8050609 AT onevision DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<478CA52E.8050609@onevision.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jan 15 13:21, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Receipe to reproduce:
>
> 1. Login to your linux box in your homeaccount.
> 2. mkdir -p ~/tmp/test
> 3. cd ~/tmp/test
> 4. mkdir subdir
> 5. ln -s subdir symlink
> 6. logout
> 7. Start cygwin 1.3.22
> 8. cp -rp //server/share/path/to/your/home/tmp/test /tmp
> 9. <everything fine>
> 10. Start cygwin 1.5 installation
> 11. cp -rp //server/share/path/to/your/home/tmp/test /tmp
> 12. Error message appears:
>
> cp: will not create hard link: '/tmp/test/symlink' to directory 
> '/tmp/test/subdir'
>
> Obviously cygwin 1.5 is now detecting the symlink correctly while 1.3 was 
> not because it copied
> the symlinked folder as folder not as link (even when I did cp -a).

Here's the reason:

Cygwin 1.5.25 uses the i-node numbers returned by
Samba > 3.x as ... i-node numbers.  Cygwin 1.3.x generated always pseudo
i-node numbers on remote drives.

When listing the files on Linux, the i-node numbers are different:

linux$ ls -li
total 4
233804 drwxr-xr-x 2 corinna users 4096 Jan 15 14:46 subdir
233805 lrwxrwxrwx 1 corinna users    6 Jan 15 14:47 symlink -> subdir

cygwin-1.5.25$ ls -li
total 0
8808978157900 drwxr-xr-x 1 corinna root 0 Jan 15 14:46 subdir
8808978157900 drwxr-xr-x 1 corinna root 0 Jan 15 14:46 symlink

Usually the i-node numbers returned by Samba are the device id in the
high dword and the actual i-node number in the low d-word:

       233804 == 0x000000000003914C
       233805 == 0x000000000003914D

8808978157900 == 0x000010060003914C

I have no idea why Samba doesn't return the correct i-node number for
symlinks.  This is most unfortunate.

Maybe the smb.conf setting "follow symlinks = no" is an option for you?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -