X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4783CF18.900@huarp.harvard.edu>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:29:28 -0500
From:	Norton Allen <allen AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Does clock() work?
References:	<4783B96D DOT 9060709 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu> <4783C3D9 DOT 6020303 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <4783CBDE DOT 8070201 AT huarp DOT harvard DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<4783CBDE.8070201@huarp.harvard.edu>
Received-SPF:	pass (ent.arp.harvard.edu: 10.0.0.122 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Norton Allen wrote:
> Greg Chicares wrote:
>> I get similar results with the same program. According to
>> C99 7.23.2.1/2,
>>   "The clock function determines the processor time used."
>> so I'd guess that sleep() is consuming only wall-clock time.
>>   
> Ah, good catch. Thank you.
> Now, I am definitely interested in wall clock elapsed time. Is there 
> anything available that will give me real time at resolution greater 
> than one second?
>
I found gettimeofday() that seems to do the trick.
-N


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -