Mail Archives: cygwin/2008/01/08/12:57:18
I am trying to write a benchmark application, and figured I'd use
clock() for sub-second resolution timing, but I got non-sensical
results. I check the cygwin archives, but the only mention I saw was
that clock() didn't work on Win98. Here's my test code, chktime.c:
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main( int argc, char **argv ) {
clock_t cur_time, cps = CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
int i;
printf( "CLOCKS_PER_SEC = %ld\n", cps );
for ( i = 0; i < 8; i++ ) {
sleep(1);
cur_time = clock();
printf( "clock() = %ld\n", cur_time );
}
return 0;
}
and here's the output I get:
Cygwin> ./chktime
CLOCKS_PER_SEC = 1000
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
clock() = 171
Cygwin>
I would expect the clock() values to increase by approximately 1000 on
each iteration. (Yes, the sleep() seems to be working, as the lines come
out at about 1 Hz.)
Is this a known problem? Do others get this result, or do I have a
corrupted library?
-Norton Allen
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -