X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:55:54 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.24-2: unalbe to get a core Dump file
Message-ID:	<20071206125554.GQ26345@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<47568201 DOT 80303 AT garr DOT it> <4756E558 DOT 1A70439F AT dessent DOT net> <47573096 DOT 7050007 AT portugalmail DOT pt> <20071206110146 DOT GL26345 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20071206114438 DOT GN26345 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20071206122212 DOT GA6144 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20071206122212.GA6144@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec  6 07:22, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:44:38PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec  6 12:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Dec  5 23:13, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >> > Brian Dessent wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> As already mentioned downthread, if you want a core dump you should
> >> >> simply set error_start=c:/cygwin/bin/dumper.exe, modulo dumper bugs
> >> >> (which should have all been fixed in the latest version.)
> >> >
> >> > The cvs version still doesn't work for me if I link
> >> > it with the distributed bfd -- it crashes in that case.
> >> > The latest fixes were done with a bfd from cvs.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't tried the latest test version, but
> >> > should have the same problem.
> >> 
> >> Do you imply that we need a new binutils package to get dumper working?
> >
> >I just built dumper with a bfd from CVS HEAD(*).  It seems to work on
> >the first glance.  Setting error_start as above, it catches the division
> >by zero from the OP's test app and creates a core file.  However, this
> >core file doesn't seem to be very helpful, at least when using GDB from
> >the distro:
> >
> >(gdb) i thr
> >  3 process 1984  0x7c95077b in ntdll!KiIntSystemCall ()
> >   from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll
> >  2 process 3020  0x7c90eb94 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource ()
> >   from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll
> >* 1 process 3836  0x7c90eb94 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource ()
> >   from /mnt/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll
> >
> >None of the backtraces shows anything beyond the system DLLs.
> >
> >Do we also need a newer GDB for this to be useful?
> 
> I'm not aware of any advances in frame handling in the CVS version of gdb
> but I'm waiting for the recent spate of win32 activity to die down before
> I release a new version of gdb.

That makes sense.  A new binutils package might be helpful, though.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -