delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-SBRS: | None |
X-MesageID: | 32249413 |
X-Ironport-Server: | ftlpip01.citrite.net |
X-Remote-IP: | 70.42.232.150 |
X-Policy: | $Relay |
X-IronPort-AV: | E=Sophos;i="4.21,378,1188792000"; d="scan'208";a="32249413" |
Date: | Tue, 6 Nov 2007 15:56:34 +0000 |
From: | Samuel Thibault <samuel DOT thibault AT ens-lyon DOT org> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: why is pthread_key_create failing? |
Message-ID: | <20071106155634.GK3795@implementation.uk.xensource.com> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <200711061512 DOT 15518 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <20071106153026 DOT GA1203 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20071106154550 DOT GB1203 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20071106154550.GB1203@calimero.vinschen.de> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Hi, Corinna Vinschen, le Tue 06 Nov 2007 16:45:50 +0100, a écrit : > Heh, I just re-read the whole discussion at > http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin%40cygwin.com/msg49835.html again, > and it's interesting how the point of view changes with another > testcase. Pity. Returning EBUSY really looked like a good idea. Mmm, the "Non-Idempotent Data Key Creation" section only says that some behavior was rejected because there is other ways to achieve it. But to me it does not mean that EBUSY would be a good idea. What explicitely says that you shouldn't reuse a pthread_key_t? Samuel -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |