delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Hi, Brian Dessent writes: > > Dave Korn wrote: > > > I don't think it was being advocated in general, but I think it's reasonable > > to assume that a pure const function like llrint isn't going to do anything > > wacky. > > Yes, I realize it was probably not a worry in this particular case, but > I didn't want somebody stumbling on the archives at a later date and > getting the bright idea that you could just go around extracting random > objects from a MinGW library for use in a Cygwin link. I completely agree, most of the time it is a very bad idea to mix MinGW objects with Cygwin's ones, that is why I extracted the llrint.o instead of linking to libmingwex.a And indeed llrint.o works only because it is self-contained. I checked that at the code: $ cat /usr/src/cygwin-1.5.24-2/winsup/mingw/mingwex/math/llrint.c #include <math.h> long long llrint (double x) { long long retval; __asm__ __volatile__ \ ("fistpll %0" : "=m" (retval) : "t" (x) : "st"); \ return retval; } Regards, Victor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |