X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4725D805.2C412C94@dessent.net>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:54:29 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: llrint implementation in Cygwin
References:	<fd68u2$geo$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <46F6C151 DOT 3070301 AT computer DOT org> <loom DOT 20071029T111515-144 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4725D1BA DOT C2D2ED8A AT dessent DOT net> <033e01c81a2a$30ae3150$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

>   I don't think it was being advocated in general, but I think it's reasonable
> to assume that a pure const function like llrint isn't going to do anything
> wacky.

Yes, I realize it was probably not a worry in this particular case, but
I didn't want somebody stumbling on the archives at a later date and
getting the bright idea that you could just go around extracting random
objects from a MinGW library for use in a Cygwin link.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -