X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<47141D40.2020108@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:09:04 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin
References:	<BB68A105182ACD4980177ABBE09017BB0591F2DC94 AT xch01-hqm-cdn DOT stw DOT int> <1192470972 DOT 29928 DOT 28 DOT camel AT raker DOT ateb DOT com> <20071015181743 DOT GD14543 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20071015181743.GD14543@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Would we get into trouble if we had a "recommended virus checker" web
> page at the cygwin site?  Or, maybe it would be a "Known working virus checkers".

What happened to http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA ?


Yaakov

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHFB1ApiWmPGlmQSMRCKYPAKCOTSTOl2NsJGH/aUVdoOuaRqNtRQCdHjso
pNk3yQCLeXXv7/XzymHqf7w=
=M9tE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -