X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:57:05 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: A problem with tgamma function
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.58.0710120952130.4055@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Lev Bishop wrote:

> I'm sure glibc and newlib would both appreciate a good algorithm for
> tgamma(), if you felt like submitting one...

It seems that a good algorithm has yet been coded in the GAMMA
implementation of CERNLIB
(http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/shortwrupsdir/c302/top.html,
http://cernlib.web.cern.ch/cernlib/download/2006_source/src/mathlib/gen/c/gamma64.F),
because with that implementation the test I posted passes...


Cheers,
  Angelo.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -