X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4702D8CA.10904@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:48:26 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Home directory
References:	<fdpta4$uev$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fdq3gi$aiq$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20071001T160325-427 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4701AB98 DOT 10509 AT byu DOT net> <fdshus$btf$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <4701D003 DOT 92BBEFDE AT dessent DOT net> <loom DOT 20071002T142220-750 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20071002T142220-750@post.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Gmain User wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Brian.  I was actually asking in the context of not updating cygwin
> right away.  Whether or not one could access up-to-date accumulation of release
> notes, possibly on the web.

Cygwin doesn't have monolithic "releases".  Every individual package is 
on its own release schedule.  It's meaningless to talk about release 
notes at a higher level than the package level, in the current scheme.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -