delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: gcc does not know about "new" and "delete" |
References: | <46F40C47 DOT 3040005 AT research DOT telcordia DOT com> <46F4741F DOT 80108 AT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <w3fy17l9em DOT fsf AT hod DOT lan DOT m-e-leypold DOT de> <20070922035357 DOT GA25395 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <crfy17t1rr DOT fsf AT hod DOT lan DOT m-e-leypold DOT de> <20070922185521 DOT GA27706 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
From: | Markus E L <ls-cygwin-2006 AT m-e-leypold DOT de> |
Date: | Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:07:36 +0200 |
In-Reply-To: | <20070922185521.GA27706@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:55:21 -0400") |
Message-ID: | <8ktzpma58n.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> |
User-Agent: | Some cool user agent (SCUG) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Markus E L wrote: >>> There are potentially other libraries which might be required for >>> C++. You really should use g++ to link C++ programs. >> >>Right. I never said differently. > > If you want to get technical, I didn't say that you did. > > Your message could be taken as implying that an alternate way to link > c++ programs was to just add -lstdc++ to the command line. I wanted to Ah, no. I hope nobody drew that (wrong) conclusion. Actually I only answered into that thread -- which originally I perceived as completely resolved -- because I thought the last post (by Erich Dollansky) showed a slightly wrong picture of the role of the gcc driver. > make sure that we didn't see subsequent email from someone who thought > that was a good way to link c++ programs. Thank's for watching out for such possibilities and forestalling any misunderstandings. Regards -- M -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |