X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20070920002241 DOT AHA56826 AT riddler DOT int DOT colorado DOT edu>
Subject:	RE: Python 2.5.1: Potential Bug in "print"
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:32:19 +0100
Message-ID:	<014701c7fb93$0cbb8a50$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<20070920002241.AHA56826@riddler.int.colorado.edu>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 20 September 2007 07:23, Mike MacFerrin wrote:

> I'm a grad student in a Compiler Tools course, and (as part of the course)
> we're compiling a subset of the Python language down to C, and from there
> to x86 Assmebly.  Our code has to pass a lengthy series of test-suites for
> correctness (comparing the output of our compiled C Code with that of
> native Python code), and I stumbled across what seems to be a quirky bug in
> Cygwin Python 2.5.1 (the most recent install).     


> Any suggestions or workarounds?

  Can you roll back your install?  2.4.3 doesn't reproduce the problem.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -