delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-ASG-Debug-ID: | 1190269362-03c700060000-w5GHUG |
X-Barracuda-URL: | http://128.138.128.141:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi |
From: | Mike MacFerrin <Michael DOT MacFerrin AT Colorado DOT EDU> |
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: | Python 2.5.1: Potential Bug in "print" |
Subject: | Python 2.5.1: Potential Bug in "print" |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.8.5-GA |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-Id: | <20070920002241.AHA56826@riddler.int.colorado.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:22:41 -0600 (MDT) |
X-Barracuda-Connect: | omr-raz-2-pub.colorado.edu[128.138.123.155] |
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: | 1190269362 |
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: | by Barracuda Spam Firewall at Colorado.EDU |
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: | 0.00 |
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: | No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=8.0 tests= |
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: | Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.28918 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
I'm a grad student in a Compiler Tools course, and (as part of the course) we're compiling a subset of the Python language down to C, and from there to x86 Assmebly. Our code has to pass a lengthy series of test-suites for correctness (comparing the output of our compiled C Code with that of native Python code), and I stumbled across what seems to be a quirky bug in Cygwin Python 2.5.1 (the most recent install). To the point. If I run a simple two-line Python module: print 0.0 print -0.0 ...it gives the following output (as you'd expect): 0.0 0.0 However, if I remove the first line: print -0.0 ...I get... -0.0 It seems to matter whether I've previously called "print 0.0" in the module. No other "print <float>" commands make a difference. Obviously, that seems strange (and doesn't follow the Python language definition). That behavior doesn't show up in other installs of Python I've seen (IDLE, Windows command-line, or Linux command-line), just in Cygwin. I'm not sure if this bug has been identified yet (it's a quirky corner case, and I didn't see anything to this affect in the Archives), but I thought I'd throw that out there. Run python and check for yourself if you wanna see it (from the shell it always prints "-0.0", but from a file it's inconsistent. Either way, it should just spit out "0.0"). In the meantime, I'm a bit frustrated that my code fails certain tests at home on Cygwin (due to no error of my own), but otherwise passes on the professor's box (MacOS command line). Eh, I s'pose it's better than vice-versa, but still. Any suggestions or workarounds? Thanks, - Mike -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |