delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: sftp removing writable bit |
Date: | Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:05:17 -0700 |
Lines: | 18 |
Message-ID: | <fcebg2$gte$1@sea.gmane.org> |
References: | <46E7FB17 DOT 3030904 AT scranton DOT edu> <fc91pf$bic$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fc953v$nf5$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcaj21$n7t$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcaoj2$44l$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcbmdp$f0s$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcbul0$b1r$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcd9s6$v7e$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <31b7d2790709140653u1fb8f970nb94c03155c0588b4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) |
In-Reply-To: | <31b7d2790709140653u1fb8f970nb94c03155c0588b4@mail.gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DePriest, Jason R. wrote: > sftp provides you with an FTP command set where scp does not > > that's about the only thing I can think of that makes a difference; > seems like a compelling reason if you are going to be doing complex > transfers, but if you are more familiar and comfortable with scp, then > use it Hey I'm just trying to learn... What "complex transfers" are possible in the ftp command set that are not possible with scp/ssh? Hey, I agree, use whatever you are more comfortable with I guess. I just think it makes a lot more sense to just use the basic command set, perhaps extended with the "s" commands for remote files, rather than set up sftp and use a different command set. IOW I've never seen the need to set up sftp and use it over just using the "s" commands... -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> Did anyone see my lost carrier? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |