delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: sftp removing writable bit |
Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:31:30 -0700 |
Lines: | 27 |
Message-ID: | <fcd9s6$v7e$1@sea.gmane.org> |
References: | <46E7FB17 DOT 3030904 AT scranton DOT edu> <fc91pf$bic$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fc953v$nf5$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcaj21$n7t$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcaoj2$44l$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcbmdp$f0s$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <fcbul0$b1r$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) |
In-Reply-To: | <fcbul0$b1r$1@sea.gmane.org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Andrew DeFaria (Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:53:25 -0700) >> Much less than the possibility of scp being present. And I'm not >> necessarily against the idea of "well go out and get a working copy >> of these programs" but often clients do not give consultants that >> privilege. > If your tools are limited or you do transfer just one file then scp is > fine. One file? scp can transfer whole trees... > But if you want some comfort you should go for the other ones. My point is the chances are better that scp will "just work" while sftp probably won't be configured... > By the way: this has nothing to do with scp versus sftp. And I'm not > really sure what you mean by scp - do you mean the protocol or the > command line tool? Command line tool. IOW why go through the bother to set up an sftp server (I assume that needs to be set up) and picking and getting an sftp client when in all likelihood scp is already there and ready to use. IOW what's the advantage of an sftp client over just plain scp? > Anyway: if I haven't convinced you yet that sftp can have its uses and > advantages then I probably never will. That's funny I was thinking the same thing! Doesn't mean we can't discuss it though... -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> Everybody repeat after me ...We are all individuals. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |