X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Tatsuro MATSUOKA <matsuoka AT mol DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	matsuoka AT nuce DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:31:29 +0900
Subject:	Re: Slowness problem due to sjlj-exceptions for Octave
In-Reply-To:	<20070906082343.87689790.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
References:	<46DE0C86 DOT 61C0ABB0 AT dessent DOT net> <20070906082343 DOT 87689790 DOT matsuoka AT mol DOT nagoya-u DOT ac DOT jp>
Message-Id:	<20070906083129.9ABD5FB0.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	nPOP Ver 1.0.9
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Just a correction of the previous mail

>I think it is better that I keep the my binary on my web but post on 
>the new binary package on the cygwin.  I do not want to build the 
>octave by the gcc in the cygwin package because it is too slow to use.

I think it is better that I keep the my binary on my web but 'not' 
post on 
the new binary package on the cygwin.  I do not want to build the 
octave by the gcc in the cygwin package because it is too slow to use.

Sorry for my carelessness.

Tatsuro MATSUOKA 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -