X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Eric Backus <eric_backus AT alum DOT mit DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: symbolic link untar issue
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<loom.20070824T220732-765@post.gmane.org>
References:	<200708202358 DOT l7KNwl7b025934 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> <46CADFAC DOT 4010209 AT byu DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:

> No, it is not an old-style link, because it has the .lnk suffix when
> viewed via Windows.  However, it is not a link that would normally be
> created by the current coreutils, since I have added some .exe magic into
> ln when symlinking against existing .exes:

From this I guess that the .exe magic is currently in the code for each 
program that might create a symlink.  Is there any way that the .exe magic 
could be moved to inside the symlink() function call, so that it automatically 
works for all programs that create symlinks?  Or does that introduce other 
problems?

-- 
Eric Backus



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -