delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:54:25 +0200 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: cygwin1.dll bug in open(O_EXCL) |
Message-ID: | <20070824185425.GW23854@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <46CEDC45 DOT 7070704 AT byu DOT net> <20070824145630 DOT GT23854 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <46CF0C0B DOT 9030703 AT byu DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <46CF0C0B.9030703@byu.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Aug 24 10:49, Eric Blake wrote: > As a side effect of your change, open("broken_symlink", O_RDWR|O_EXCL) now > fails with EACCES instead of ENOENT, but since POSIX leaves O_EXCL without > O_CREAT as undefined behavior. That's why I didn't add any further testing for other cases with O_EXCL. Isn't it good to know to have a fully POSIX-compliant undefined behaviour? ;) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |