X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:53:17 -0700
From:	"David A. Case" <case AT scripps DOT edu>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Using 'complex.h' and GCC-3.4.4-3 in Cygwin
Message-ID:	<20070726155317.GB1848@scripps.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0707261210050 DOT 23382 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it> <46A8845B DOT 2080208 AT cox DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<46A8845B.2080208@cox.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-Spam-Score:	undef - spam scanning disabled
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007, Greg Chicares wrote:

> > $ gcc test_complex_h.c
> > test_complex_h.c:3:21: complex.h: No such file or directory
> 
> I suppose newlib doesn't provide a full C99 implementation yet.

I've had good luck with the c9x-complex package:

    http://www.moshier.net/c9x_readme.html

Of course, you should test carefully yourself, but for me this provides
a "complex.h" header and the associated functions that seem to work fine
with cygwin.

...dave case


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -