X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<46A7DE99.CA6B21B2@dessent.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:36:57 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: libdb4.5 package discrepancy
References:	<f88mah$j7f$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l6PNb5nx031686

René Berber wrote:

>         libdb4.5-devel: Oracle Berkeley DB, the industry-leading open source,
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> $ cygcheck --check-setup libdb4.5
                           ^^^^^^^^

You're comparing two different things here.  It's standard practice to
split out the developer parts and the runtime parts of a library into
separate packages, because most users only need the latter.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -