X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:31:15 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Emacs is coming back - 2nd try
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.58.0707171523280.31484@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

For the sake of completeness:

Eric Blake wrote:

> Shouldn't the second cygconf also set LDFLAGS?  In fact, if my
> understanding is correct, the problem of auto-image-base and auto-import
> are MORE important for the X version, because it is pulling in more
> libraries.

I have tried to use -1 and -2 of emacs22 under X and they segment fault
starting whitout a stackdump file.

Instead my build (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-06/msg00049.html) works
fine. (The build was in the style: configure, make, make install)


Cheers,

  Angelo.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -