Mail Archives: cygwin/2007/06/28/14:37:49
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:39 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: possible compiler optimization error
>
> On 28 June 2007 18:19, Frederich, Eric P21322 wrote:
>
> Your code has a bug, most likely an uninitialised or otherwise stray
> pointer, but could be anything that causes undefined
> behaviour. It works on
> Linux/Solaris by good fortune, because whatever memory
> addresses you're
> stomping all over just happen to be free and safe to stomp on on those
> platforms, whereas windows systems have different process
> space layout
During development of this program I used Valgrind on Linux to detect
memory allocation and un-initialized pointer type of errors. I do not
believe this is the case.
> Now, there /could/ be a compiler bug, but unless you can
> present us with a
> testcase that we can compile ourselves and test out, it's not
> going to be easy
> to help you. Fragmentary code snippets aren't useful. For
> advice on how to
> write a really good compiler bug report, see the guidelines at
Yes, I do realize this. I figured that describing the behavior would be
enough to diagnose the problem without having to cut down an 8,000 line
program into a concise example. It turns out that it was and Brian
Dessent suggested some more compiler flags to help with floating point
accuracy, -ffloat-store.
Thanks for your help.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -