X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<46830556.5000402@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:48:22 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getting emacs in cygwin
References:	<11269985 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <195b3f1f0706231557p2ded4808r45dcca3f3f64cf97 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <11271262 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <195b3f1f0706260229q103bec3ele9a3a998d9c36cab AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <468104CF DOT 2040200 AT cygwin DOT com> <195b3f1f0706262325v6c185b0ajec1b9909a2ec3e5f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4682572E DOT 7010704 AT cygwin DOT com> <195b3f1f0706271628x5f2c35a9me1013942c9dfb754 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<195b3f1f0706271628x5f2c35a9me1013942c9dfb754@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Wynfield Henman wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <reply-to-list-only-lh <at> cygwin <dot> com> wrote:
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>.  Thanks.

>> Wynfield Henman wrote:
>> > Larry,
>> >  I tried using "run.exe" as you suggested in "cygwin.bat" but it does
>> > not work.  The issue is not emacs, but the initial login terminal.
>>
>> Why are you starting emacs from cygwin.bat?
> 
> I am not.
> You are the one that suggested that by using it one would avoid the 
> cmd.exe box.
> And the only time that is a problem is when starting up cygwin and only 
> then.

Depends on how you want to use Cygwin's tools, though I gather from your
responses so far that the above statement is true for you.

>> 'run.exe' is designed to be run directly from the Windows GUI (not from
>> any console/terminal).  If you've already started a console or terminal,
>> it's really not needed.
> Why would you use a MS Windows GUI to run a cygwin program?

Some people like to associate Cygwin tools with certain mime types so it's
possible to click on a file in the explorer, for example, and have their
favorite Cygwin tool open the file.

> I guess you got confused since there were two different points being
> discussed.
> Regarding the dos box, when starting cygwin initially.  Because we
> already have a putty terminal emulator which is superior.

If you are happy with putty and the behavior you currently have, then
you should keep it.  I only recommend 'run.exe' for areas where it may
be applicable. I don't mandate it. ;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -