X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	David Kastrup <dak AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: Problem with stat
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:34:21 +0200
Lines:	38
Message-ID:	<86ps3irapu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
References:	<46808EA8 DOT 2030202 AT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <4680DD73 DOT 8090300 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> <4680E3A0 DOT 3020508 AT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <4680FE40 DOT 7010102 AT byu DOT net> <46810D24 DOT 9000303 AT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <46810FAA DOT 5050508 AT byu DOT net> <86zm2mdfox DOT fsf AT lola DOT quinscape DOT zz> <468112F2 DOT 10802 AT byu DOT net> <86vedade9q DOT fsf AT lola DOT quinscape DOT zz> <loom DOT 20070626T160440-648 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> >> fstat, yes.  But shouldn't stat be able to report S_ISLNK on a broken
>> >> link?
>> >
>> > No.  It must fail with ENOENT.
>> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/stat.html
>> 
>> No information there.  "component of a path" has nothing to do with
>> symlink resolution.
>> 
>
> "If the named file is a symbolic link, the stat() function shall
> continue pathname resolution using the contents of the symbolic
> link, and shall return information pertaining to the resulting file
> if the file exists."

This says nothing about what is returned if the file does not exist.

> In other words, if file is a broken symlink, symlink resolution MUST
> take place,

Nothing whatsoever in the above states this.  Only the behavior when
the resulting file exists is specified.

> at which point, the brokenness of the symlink means that stat() MUST
> fail with ENOENT because a component of the path does not exist.

I don't see where this is apparent from the wording.

> Cygwin is correct here, as is Linux.

They don't conflict, but that is all.

-- 
David Kastrup


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -