X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
User-Agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:52:53 -0700
Subject:	Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils
From:	Brian Dantes <bldantes AT comcast DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<C292DA05.6B2A%bldantes@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:	<466D8809.6030003@cygwin.com>
Mime-version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

More specifically, can object code generated by Cygwin g++ 3.4.4 be linked
with MinGW gcc 3.4.2 libraries and vice versa? For example, I know this is
*not* true for MinGW g++ 3.2.1; libstdc++ changed significantly between g++
3.2.1 and 3.4.4.

Brian

> From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
> Reply-To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400
> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils
> 
> On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote:
>> As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2
>> (the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's
>> gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin?
> 
> You mean object code-wise?  Yes.  Cygwin is building Win32 executables, just
> like MinGW.
> 
> -- 
> Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
> RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
> 216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
> Holliston, MA 01746
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> 
> A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -