X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:26:15 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: brltty 3.8
Message-ID:	<20070606192615.GG22248@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20070605230831 DOT GC3356 AT implementation> <f45rfu$r9r$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20070606085100 DOT GA5082 AT implementation> <4666819A DOT 52A6488D AT dessent DOT net> <4666FA77 DOT 7000105 AT gmail DOT com> <31b7d2790706061222wb5a2134hb385f9c383eca05e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<31b7d2790706061222wb5a2134hb385f9c383eca05e@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:22:30PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
> On 6/6/07, Dave  wrote:
>> Brian Dessent wrote:
>> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> >> Mmm, because for a blind person this is a very basic package?
>> >
>> > Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that most Cygwin users are blind.
>>
>> Last I heard, setup.exe was not particularly friendly wrt screen readers
>> (cf. package selection). Hence the visually impaired would have
>> difficulty selecting brltty for installation.
>>
>> In addition to installation brltty also needs an amount of configuration
>> to select the type of terminal to use, and for the daemon to be started.
>>
>> Despite the latter I would suggest that (at least the non-X bit of)
>> brltty should be kept in Base to make things simpler for those who need
>> it. At least until we get that revamped setup.exe :)
>
> It seems that when you trace the requirements of brltty down, you end
> up with xorg, perl, and python packages getting installed.
>
> So, do we want those to be considered part of Base?

No.  I've removed it from Base.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -