X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<465F1C16.1090305@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 May 2007 12:03:50 -0700
From:	Tom <fivemiletom AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 4.x?
References:	<465F16EA DOT 1040007 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<465F16EA.1040007@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

My apologies, I must have missed the latest one about GCC 4.2.0 RC3 for 
some reason, sorry.


Tom wrote:
> There is an email thread from 2006 to this topic:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00507.html
> 
> I have compiled my own GCC 4.2.0 for cygwin, but not tested and not 
> really used it a lot. And I must admit that what Charles et al were 
> talking about is not my core expertise.
> 
> I would appreciate any status update on 4.x, too.
> 
> 
> Brian Hassink wrote:
>  > Just curious what the issues are that are holding up [..]
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -