delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <10832118.post@talk.nabble.com> |
Date: | Mon, 28 May 2007 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT) |
From: | ilak1008 <ilak1008 AT yahoo DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Processing A Script Too Slow under Cygwin |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Nabble-From: | ilak1008 AT yahoo DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that processing a script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU. Is there a way to make the processing faster? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Processing-A-Script-Too-Slow-under-Cygwin-tf3826478.html#a10832118 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |