X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	=?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgQmVyYmVy?= <r DOT berber AT computer DOT org>
Subject:	Re: 1.5.21: inetd telnet connections: fork error
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2007 05:29:29 -0500
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<f36dqe$rjg$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<BAY139-F29B243A255EF3FB4806920FC2B0 AT phx DOT gbl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
In-Reply-To:	<BAY139-F29B243A255EF3FB4806920FC2B0@phx.gbl>
OpenPGP:	url=hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Nick Telepneff wrote:

> I have installed and run the cygwin inetd telnet server and find that
> when more than around 16 users connect via telnet the shells start to
> fail with the following message:
> 16622413 [main] -bash 3868 fork: child -1 - died waiting for longjmp
> before initialization, retry 0, exit code 0x80, errno 11
> -bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable

Are these connections starting simultaneously?

> Each session starts a sh.exe, an in.telnetd.exe and one or more
> application processes (though so far we=E2=80=99ve only loaded 2). Each o=
r these
> processes takes between 4Mb and 10Mb memory according to Windows task
> Manager.
>=20
> We need to be able to run at least 24 telnet connections using an
> average of 3 application processes.
>=20
> The machine we=E2=80=99re using is a Xeon processor with 4Gb Ram running =
Windows
> 2000.

Normal Xeon or one of the new 2-core Xeons?

> Can anyone help?

Not at this time, if the answer to my first question is yes then perhaps yo=
u are
running into a Windows limitation which AFAIK exists only in XP-SP2; if the
answer to the second question is yes there has been another thread that rep=
orts
problems with 2-core processors and possible workarounds.
--=20
Ren=C3=A9 Berber


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -