delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Speed of Cygwin's cp vs. Windows Explorer |
References: | <942b10df0705120623r391f6bdeg7aaf5643901a03b0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <46463434 DOT 2060909 AT byu DOT net> |
From: | ls-cygwin-2006 AT m-e-leypold DOT de |
Date: | Sun, 13 May 2007 15:18:08 +0200 |
In-Reply-To: | <46463434.2060909@byu.net> (Eric Blake's message of "Sat, 12 May 2007 15:40:04 -0600") |
Message-ID: | <731whk3lrj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> |
User-Agent: | Some cool user agent (SCUG) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Eric Blake <ebb9 AT xxx DOT xxx> writes: > According to Bob Heckel on 5/12/2007 7:23 AM: >> Why would using Cygwin's cp to copy a large file from one Windows XP >> box to another take 30 minutes but take only 10 minutes if I use drag >> 'n' drop (via Explorer)? > > It has been mentioned in the past, and one of the ideas was adding support > for posix_fadvise (added in the snapshots, but not in 1.5.x) and making > coreutils take advantage of it to give Windows better hints about how the > data being manipulated will be laid out. I have not yet had time to play > with this idea further, and the upstream coreutils maintainers are > reluctant to rely on posix_fadvise just yet (since Linux currently has a > bug where stating a file is read-once flushes it from the os cache for ALL > processes, rather than just the process that is only going to read it > once, which makes the read-once hint rather useless). I thought that was what software configuration (and autoconf) was for: -DHAVE_DEFECTIVE_fadvise or something like that should just remove the support from coreutils like (AFAIR) you can remove use of mmap() too. >> I'm in a position of defending the use of Cygwin instead of the manual >> Windows way of doing things by those not familiar with Unix. Any >> hints would be appreciated. > > At least cygwin cp preserves permissions correctly. Windows drag-n-drop > has the annoying tendency of marking everything executable. :-) Regards -- Markus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |